| |
ROLLERBALL
An MGM release
review
by Joseph B. Mauceri
SYNOPSIS:
Jonathan Cross (KLEIN), a young aspiring athlete, is waiting for
his turn at the professional sports when he gets in trouble with
the law for illegal street racing. Taking his friend's, Marcus Ridley
(LL COOL J), he heads for Eastern Europe and the growing sport of
Rollerball. As part of the team known as the Horsemen, Cross becomes
a star, and along with Ridley is leading the team to a championship
season. The owner of the team and the majority shareholder in the
sport, Russian business mogul Alexi Petrovich has his eye on a bigger
prize - a global cable franchise deal of the sport. Keeping a watchful
eye on viewer demographics and ratings for the sport, Petrovich
will let nothing stand in his way of securing this big deal, even
his charismatic American stars.
REVIEW:
A few weeks ago I received an episode of AMC's "The Back Story"
for "Predator," which was directed by McTiernan. He talked about
how he used certain elements of the film to make social commentary.
And here I thought it was a cleverly directed hybrid of a war/sci-fi
film. So, the director of "Die Hard" and "Die Hard With a Vengeance"
took aim on Norman Jewison's classic ROLLERBALL. The 1975 film is
good science fiction because it is socially conscious, but presents
those issues in a futuristic setting. In similar fashion, Paul Verhoeven's
1987 "Robocop" was also a remarkable social commentary, with a nice
helping of satire. It's more then a few years since I last read
Harrison's short story, but I haven't got a clue as to what McTiernan
was thinking or trying to say with this film.
The
opening scene has Cross (KLEIN) engaged in some type of illegal
street sport on the hilly streets of San Francisco. I guess he wants
us to think that we've arrived "ten minutes into the future," but
it's not clear as to when exactly. His daredevil stunt places him
on the wrong side of the law so the location jumps to Eastern Europe.
A good idea for a setting, but it gets lost in the excitement of
the game. All of a sudden we're into the tick of it and we're supposed
to be "oohed" and "ahed" by the sets, costumes and stunts. The first
and longest game sequence in the film - I didn't time it but it
felt longer then even the film's climax - gets old really quick.
There was more action in the old roller derbies they use to show
on television. Maybe we've become a bit desensitized by all the
violence and sports on television, but McTiernan should have brought
in Vince McMann of the WWF to choreograph these sequences.
The
film flips through several matches in other third world countries,
and we're supposed to follow the story of the corrupt Petrovich
(Reno) and his third world thugs. The character is written like
a stereotype, so are we supposed to be surprised by his motives?
In fact, are we really supposed to care about Cross or Ridley? These
less then squeaky-clean characters have fled the States in hopes
of fortune and fame. When they have a change of heart we're supposed
to feel for them? Even Cross' motives in the climax can be reduced
to your basic selfish principles. The actors are limited in their
performances by the numerous characters that populate the plot.
They also must contend with numerous Rollerball competitions, and
car chases. I think the flashy cars and motorcycles end up with
more screen times then the actors.
Smacked
into the middle of the film is a chase sequence McTiernan chooses
to shoot as if it were filmed through night vision goggles. You
know, the washed out green screen we've seen from war footage. It
might have been use as an effect, or it could have been thought
of as "stylized," I was more compelled to think it was employed
for budgetary reasons - they couldn't afford a light package to
shoot in the desert.
As
in the original, the "villain" is concerned with the ratings of
the show. Maybe McTiernan should have been a bit less socially conscious
and more concerned about the basic Hollywood principle of filmmaking
- Entertaining! This attempt at updating ROLLERBALL has several
elements that could have render this a more engaging film then its
predecessor, but it is a cluttered collage of ideas that lacks any
clear definition or purpose. Fine performances go to waste, as does
almost two-hours of my life.
OFFICIAL
WEB SITE:
http://www.rollerball.com
BACK
|
OVERALL
WORTH
based
on a Manhattan price
of
$9.50 |
| STORY |
$4.00 |
| ACTING |
$6.00 |
| DIRECTING |
$3.00 |
PRODUCTION
DESIGN |
$7.50 |
SPECIAL
EFFECTS |
$3.00 |
SCORE/MUSIC
SONGS |
$2.00 |
| "REAL"
VALUE |
$4.25 |
SUMMARY:
The
action and politically minded director John McTiernan drops
the ball and delivers an uninspired remake of a classic genre
film.
|
|
CREDITS:
CREW:
Director/Producer
- John McTiernan; Based on the short story "Roller Ball Murders"
by William Harrison; Screenplay - Larry Ferguson, John Pogue
and William Harrison; Producers - Charles Roven & Beau
St. Clair; Cinematography - Steve Mason; Score - Eric Serra;
Production Design - Dennis Bradford & Norman Garwood;
Art Direction - Helen Jarvis; Costume Design - Kate Harrington;
Special Makeup Effects Artists - Karrieann Heisner & Heisner
Karrieann; Visual Effects Director - John Sullivan.
CAST:
CHRIS
KLEIN... Jonathan Cross; JEAN RENO... Petrovich; LL COOL J...
Marcus Ridley; REBECCA ROMIJN-STAMOS... Aurora; OLEG TAKTAROV...
Denekin; NAVEEN ANDREWS... Sanjay; DAVID HEMBLEN... Serokin;
JANET WRIGHT... Coach Olga; ANDREW BRYNIARSKI... Halloran;
Kata Dob?... Katya;; PINK... Herself; SLIPKNOT...
Themselves.
|
|