| |
QUEEN
OF THE DAMNED
A Warner
Bros. release
review
by Joseph B. Mauceri
SYNOPSIS:
Based on Anne Rice's "The Vampire Chronicles," QUEEN OF THE DAMNED
is a bastard hybridization of her novels The Vampire Lestat
and Queen of the Damned. Lestat is awakened from his long
slumber by a band of musicians who are practicing in what was once
the home for him and Louie. Louie, you remember, the vampire Brad
Pitt played in "Interview With a Vampire." Anyway, he decides the
rock star lifestyle suites his vampire nature. His music has
attracted mortal fans, but angered his fellow vampires. In fact,
his music has awakened Akasha, the mother of all vampires. She and
Lestat had a moment a few centuries ago, and she decides it's time
for her to do that Emperor Nero thing, but with a vampire's flare.
Anyway, if you read the books you know what happens next. In fact,
you know more then most people who will be experiencing the material
for the first time and be left clueless as to what the hell is going
on in the background.
REVIEW:
Anne Rice's Victorian vampires are re-envisioned as angelic waifs,
and the character development, along with vast pages of the plot,
are drained from this cinematic adaptation of the tale. Screenwriters
Abbott and Petroni have thrown the proverbial "baby" out with the
bathwater in trying to cram the contents of both The Vampire
Lestat and Queen of the Damned into a 90-minute feature.
There is an arrogance on the filmmakers' part that the majority
of the audience
for this film will be the millions of fans of Rice's series. Therefore,
they've rendered a character driven narrative to it's scarcer components
of setting and action. Still, this might have worked had the filmmakers
had a sense of style, storytelling and the power of this modern
myth. Simple and cliched cinematic devices should have been employed
to add some richness and a dash more back
story to make the film engaging, but it is extremely flat. I believe
that any film based on source material should lead the audience
back to that material. However, that is not the case here. In discussing
the film with my colleague Mike Sargent, he said, "I never read
the book, but I like this movie. It's a vampire film, and I don't
why, based on this, that I would have to read the book." I think
that clearly illustrates the point that a bad film adaptation can
inhibit a new audience from discovering the material.
As
a fan of Mrs. Rice's fiction, even though I had some problems with
Neil Jordan's adaptation of "Interview With a Vampire," the film
succeeded in capture the period, mood, and look of the vampires.
I think actor Stuart Townsend gets Lestat more then Tom Cruz did.
Now had he been present in the fashion with which Ms. Rice created
her character it would have won some points
with the fans. Overall the casting here is weak, as is the direction
of some major talent. The director's lack of skill is evident in
the flaccid performances of the talented Vincent Perez and Lena
Olin. These major stars are tragically wasted. It's obvious that
Aaliyah was cast as the
Queen Akasha due to her popularity. It's sad to say, but she can't
act. And with a director who
isn't getting much from his actors, what should have been a regal,
erotic, charismatic and terrifying monster comes across more like
a spoiled child vampire character form a single episode of "Buffy
the Vampire Slayer."
The
final key element to this section of "The Vampire Chronicles" is
the music. Again, the filmmakers come up short. It's obvious that
Richard Gibbs is no Danny Elfman or Elliott Goldenthal. All the
composers I've interviewed make a statement to the effect that a
score should
be unnoticeable in its effectiveness. Gibbs score is unmemorable.
That could be a result of the horribly memorable music by Jonathan
Davis. Davis, the lead singer of KoRn, was brought on to create
Lestat's rock songs. It's obvious that this duo is no Elton John
and Tim Rice.
At
the beginning of The Vampire Lestat, and the film, Lestat talks
about how he was driven to his slumber by the uninspired period
he found himself in. Michael Rymer's adaptation of QUEEN OF THE
DAMNED could very well have driven Anne Rice and her "Vampire Chronicles"
to their crypt. However, the fans should set upon this film like
the vampires upon the Queen because there
is hope. As I write this review, I have confirmed that Elton John
is working with Anne Rice on a musical stage verison of "Interview
With a Vampire." Plus, we can always lick our fangs and return to
the fantastical gothic world of these tragic vampires that still
lives within the pages of Mrs. Rice's fiction.
OFFICIAL
WEB SITE:
http://queenofthedamned.warnerbros.com/
BACK
|
OVERALL
WORTH
based
on a Manhattan price
of
$9.50 |
| STORY |
$4.50 |
| ACTING |
$6.00 |
| DIRECTING |
$4.50 |
PRODUCTION
DESIGN |
$5.00 |
SPECIAL
EFFECTS |
$5.00 |
SCORE/MUSIC
SONGS |
$4.00 |
| "REAL"
VALUE |
$4.83 |
SUMMARY:
At
its best, a "B" horror movie; at its worst, one of the most
uninspired, offensive film adaptations to ever make it into
theaters.
|
|
CREDITS:
CREW:
Director
- Michael Rymer; Based on the novel Queen of the Damned by
Anne Rice;
Screenplay
- Scott Abbott & Michael Petroni; Producer - Jorge Saralegui;
Cinematographer - Ian
Baker;
Score - Richard Gibbs; Original Soundtrack - Jonathan Davis;
Production Designer -
Graham
Walker; Costume Design - Angus Strathie; Special Effects Makeup
Artist - Bob
McCarron;
Visual Effects Supervisor - Gregory McMurry; Special Effect
Companies - Gray Matters, Manex Visual Effects & Rising
Sun Pictures.
CAST:
STUART
TOWNSEND... Lestat; AALIYAH... Akasha (Queen of the Damned);
MARGUERITE MOREAU... Jesse Reeves; VINCENT PEREZ... Marius;
LENA OLIN... Maharet; PAUL MCGANN... David Talbot; MATTHEW
NEWTON... Armand; JONATHAN DAVIS... Scalper.
|
|